Dienstag, 11. August 2015

Building an Uber for Health Care

Services splint strains and suture wounds on-site; Are house calls better than ER visits?


Darren Gold had a stomach virus the first time he used an app called Heal to summon a doctor to his Beverly Hills home. He liked the Stanford-trained doctor who showed up so much that he called Heal again when his 2-year-old son had a fever, and again when the whole family had colds.
The charges—$99 each for the first two visits; $200 for the family—weren’t covered by insurance, but Mr. Gold, who owns a corrugated-box company, says that was still a bargain compared with taking time off work to go to the doctor. “Now, whenever my son bumps himself, he says, ‘Daddy, we need to get the doctor here,’ ” Mr. Gold says.
Heal is one of several startups putting a high-tech spin on old-fashioned house calls—or “in-person visits,” since they can take place anywhere. The services provide a range of nonemergency medical care—from giving flu shots to treating strep throats and stitching lacerations—much like a mobile urgent-care clinic.
The companies use slightly different models. Pager, in New York City, dispatches doctors or nurse practitioners via Uber, for $200. Heal, in Los Angeles, San Francisco and Orange County, Calif., promises to “get a doctor to your sofa in under an hour” for $99. (A medical assistant goes along to do the driving and parking.)
RetraceHealth, in Minneapolis, has a nurse practitioner consult with patients via video (for $50), and only comes to their homes if hands-on care like a throat swab or blood draw is necessary (for $150).

An Uber-type service to allow doctors to make house calls? There’s an app for that. Pager.com Chief Technology Officer Oscar Salazar and WSJ’s Tanya Rivero discuss the site’s service to doctors and patients and its newest round of funding. Photo: Pager
Atlanta-based MedZed sends a nurse to a patient’s home to do a preliminary exam. Then the nurse connects via laptop with a doctor who provides a treatment plan remotely. Several Atlanta practices use MedZed as a way to offer patients extended hours without having to keep their offices open.
Most of the services don’t accept insurance, but they say patients can pay with health savings accounts or submit out-of-network claims.
Such ventures are fueled by a confluence of trends, including growing interest in the so-called sharing economy, where technology connects providers with excess capacity and consumers who want on-demand services. Many doctors and nurses who work for hospitals are eager for extra work in their off-hours, the companies say. The services carry malpractice insurance, but say overall low overhead keeps prices down.
And thanks to the boom in mobile-medical technology, providers can carry key equipment with them, from portable blood analyzers to hand-held ultrasounds.
The companies are attracting venture-capital investment and partnerships with hospital systems, which increasingly see in-home care as a way to reduce unnecessary ERs visits and readmissions.
 
Health systems “are experimenting with many different options to get patients the right level of care,” says Pam Nicholson, senior vice president for strategic initiatives for Centura Health, Colorado’s largest hospital chain. Centura is teaming up with True North Health Navigation, a Denver startup that offers on-scene care to 911 callers as an alternative to a costly ambulance ride to the ER. Centura plans to offer True North’s home-care services to its own employees and other patients whose costs it is responsible for under insurance contracts.
House calls, which accounted for 40% of all doctor visits in 1930, dwindled to less than 1% by 1980 as physicians found it far more efficient to see 20 or 30 patients a day in an office than just a handful in their homes. But in-home care is starting to be seen as cost-efficient again—particularly for the most expensive patients. A pilot project providing in-home care for 8,400 Medicare patients with multiple chronic-conditions cut costs by more than $3,000 per patient, the agency reported in June.
Analysts say it’s unclear whether many of the new on-demand services will reduce costs for those chronically ill patients—or mainly make it more convenient for the healthy and wealthy to get care they could have gone without.
Pager, which has treated about 5,000 patients in New York’s five boroughs since its founding last year, says a typical patient is a young mother with one sick child and others she doesn’t want to bring along to the doctor’s office too or leave at home. “Health checks,” in which a nurse does cholesterol, blood pressure, blood sugar and other tests for $75, are also popular—even in office settings.
On one such visit recently, Kunal Merchant, a 34-year old Facebook executive with a new baby on the way, wanted to be sure he was healthy, but didn’t want to take hours off work to visit a primary-care physician he barely knew. So he booked an office conference room, and scheduled a Pager visit. Registered nurse Eve Rorison brought all the gear she needed to check his blood sugar, blood pressure, cholesterol, heart rate and BMI, in her backpack. About 15 minutes and one finger prick later, she declared, “You’re very healthy—keep up the good work.”
Many of the services bill themselves as an “Uber for health-care”—but to date, they haven’t sparked the kind of opposition from traditional doctor practices that the ride-sharing service has from taxi drivers. That’s in part because the house-call companies are new and small and in part because they employ licensed medical professionals—generally doctors, nurses and nurse practitioners with experience in primary care or emergency medicine, looking to earn extra money in their spare time. The providers generally take home about half of the house-call fee, and make fewer than 10 calls a day. But many say they enjoy the chance to take their time with patients. “I love my Pager shifts—it’s back to real medicine, just you and the patient,” says Kimberly Henderson, an ER physician at Beth Israel Hospital in New York who works for Pager one or two days a week.
Still, Alan Ayers, a spokesman for the Urgent Care Association of America, a trade group, says urgent-care clinics provide all the same services that the house-call companies do, far more efficiently. He also asks, “What quality control is there over the clinical environment in someone’s home? Does it have the right light? Is it sanitary?”
What’s more, some office-based physicians fear that dialing up doctors like taxi rides will further fragment health-care delivery and interfere with doctor-patient relationships. “Someone who knows you well might say, ‘Why would you need to be seen three times in four weeks for a cold? Maybe it’s really heart failure’,” says Robert Wergin, president of the American Academy of Family Physicians, who practices in rural Milford, Neb.
The on-demand house-call companies counter that they will send reports to patients’ regular physicians on request. They also say that most people who try the services become repeat users. “Once you’ve had pizza delivered, you rarely go pick up pizza again,” says Thompson Aderinkomi, a health-care economist who founded RetraceHealth in 2013.
House-call providers also say that even if conditions aren’t ideal, they get to know patients far better seeing them at home than they would in a hurried office or ER visit.
Caren Misky, a nurse practitioner with True North Health Navigation in Denver, says she recently responded to a call where an Alzheimer’s patient had fallen and cut his head. She was able to staple his wound at the kitchen table while he had breakfast. “His wife said the last time that happened, they spent eight hours in the ER and had a $10,000 bill,” Ms. Misky says.
True North is one of the few services that is reducing ER use. It was founded in part because local fire chief Rick Lewis wanted to offer 911 callers who had minor, nonemergency health issues an alternative between no care and a costly ambulance ride to the ER.
Now, if the 911 dispatcher determines that the caller has a low acuity case, the True North mobile unit goes to the scene along with the fire department’s paramedics. Once the paramedics confirm the situation isn’t life-threatening, the caller can choose between being treated by a nurse practitioner on the spot, for $200 to $300, (which is covered by most Colorado insurance plans) or going by ambulance to the ER, which typically costs $3,000 or more.
“You essentially get the same person who would see you in the ER, with a lot of the same equipment, for a lot less money than you’d pay there,” says Chief Lewis.
True North, which is changing its name to Dispatch Health, is expanding so that Denver residents can summon at-home visits via phone, app or Web without calling 911.
CEO Mark Parther says his teams have treated about 400 911 callers who would otherwise have gone to the ER since 2013. He adds: “We get a thank-you note every week.”

Mittwoch, 22. Juli 2015

The US, China, and India Take Lion’s Share Of Funding To Global E-Commerce Startups

 Source: cbinsights.com

USA, India, and China are the top markets for funding to e-commerce startups. Together, they account for 62% of global deals and 71% of total funding going to e-commerce startups.
With over 950 e-commerce deals, the US drives 5x more deals than India and China, but US deals tend to be smaller funding rounds. China actually drives a slightly higher share of global funding than the US, despite accounting for just 9% of global deal flow. A few more data points:
  • Chinese e-commerce companies received the most funding, about $9.9B dollars over 188 total deals. This is a higher total funding amount than the US market, and translates to $53M per deal. That’s also a considerably higher average deal size than what the US and India are seeing.
  • The US market has seen $9.8B invested over 962 deals, for an average of $10M per deal, less than one-fifth of China’s deal size. That said, the US market drives extremely high deal volume and accounted for 45% of global deals.
  • India lags the two leading markets, with $5.6B invested over 184 deals, for an average of $30M per deal, which is about 3x the deal size seen in the US market, but significantly smaller than the deal size of China.
  • Other major players are Germany with $2.8B invested over 168 deals, and the UK with $1.2B invested over 98 deals.
Geography - USa,china,India Graphic
The chart below shows each of the major countries’ breakdown of deal type by dollar share, revealing an emphasis on late-stage funding in several markets.
  • The US market saw an even distribution with about 34% of dollars going to late-stage investments, and 21% to early-stage rounds (somewhat bucking the general global trend toward lopsided dollar-share held by the late stage).
  • In India, about 66% of total dollars went to late-stage investments in companies such as FlipkartQuickr, and Snapdeal. This is a lot higher than the regular distribution to late-stage investments. Additionally, only 4% of dollar funding went to early-stage investments.
  • China and Germany had a similar and more usual investment-stage distribution with around a 40% dollar-share for late-stage investments, and less than a 10% share for early-stage investments. Some major late-stage Chinese investments include Jingdong,  Dianping and Uxin Pai.
ed11-dealshare
Note: For this analysis, we focused solely on companies selling physical goods. We excluded e-commerce startups focused on services or digital goods (e.g., video, apps, and music).

Freitag, 17. Juli 2015

The Future: Human Plus Machine Equals Better Medicine

Opinion Article by Dr. Guy Wood-Gush, CEO of Deontics.

Comment: Actual technology developments in AI, machine learning, deep learning on the one side , and lowering prices for cloud services, hardware devices on the other side prepare the ground for quicker deployments as known from the past. So watch out !

A turning pointing for artificial intelligence (AI) came when the computer Deep Blue beat world champion Garry Kasparov at chess 18 years ago. Since those early days some of the best minds have been working on applying AI in medicine. Today, I'd like to see where AI could take us in clinical practice.
Here's a scenario. A man falls down in the street clutching his chest. An ambulance arrives armed with the latest tools in AI, and takes multiple streams of data to look for patterns.
Paramedics make their initial observations, speaking directly into a voice recognition system that picks up the salient data points from his natural language, such as name, GP, date of birth, symptoms and clinical signs. The system starts to look for the patient's GP record and medical history, and any clinical notes from local hospitals. The crew measure and record blood pressure, pulse, and O2 saturation. The devices they carry immediately start to show differential diagnosis, with probabilities, and recommend next steps.
Back at the hospital, the data are accessed. Clinical indicators at the scene and the GP record are pointing towards a myocardial infarction (MI). Which pathway should the patient start at hospital?
The admitting doctor agrees that MI is likely and implements an ECG and chest x-ray. A single click orders all relevant tests and records the fact that the patient is diabetic. In addition to the MI pathway, the patient is automatically entered on the diabetes comorbidity pathway and the patient's blood sugar is evaluated against historical personal data. The system immediately sends out a clinical alert that the patient's blood sugar is dangerously low and needs intervention.
On arrival, the doctor dictates a clinical assessment into a voice recognition system that recognises and records relevant data items. It confirms a suspected MI, and implements the recommended actions to address low blood sugar.
All the time, data in the clinical AI system are building. The system interprets the ECG and the chest x-ray, automatically finding a pattern that is consistent with chronic cardiac damage from hypertension. The system recommends cardiac catheterisation as the next step and the doctor confirms this. Patient-specific antihypertensive therapy is recommended.

So how is this fundamentally different to what doctors do here and now? Is this human versus machine? And is the medical Deep Blue about to beat the human clinician?
The fundamental difference is that AI adds a layer of analytics and automation to medicine that removes the need for duplication, reduces error, and drives patients towards the correct pathways while avoiding the danger of missing unusual diagnoses.
It makes sure that the right things happen to the patient at the right time, in the right place, and in the right order, and reduces unwarranted variation in clinical practice. It brings together clinical data with guidelines and allows clinicians to make the best-informed decisions for each individual.
This is human plus machine and I would argue that it equals better medicine.
With AI, the role of the doctor changes to become more like the pilot of a modern aeroplane. The computer does a lot of the flying but the plane still needs the pilot.
The doctor can be released from the paperwork and spend more time with the patient. AI enables the patient to join in shared decision making based around the same evidence as clinicians.
Early AI systems relied on coding and structured logic; but people are unique. Advanced AI can provide a smarter approach that starts from where the patient is now and changes as the patient's parameters change. Think of it as a 'sat nav' for medicine.
Fundamentally clinical logic has to be modelled accurately using a clinical logic language such as Proforma, which was explicitly designed around a patient safety and quality agenda.
So what of this scenario already exists? Algorithms that can interpret chest x-rays and ECGs are out there. Proforma-based tools can already match clinical parameters against clinical guidelines and extract the correct patient pathway. It's already being used here in the UK and the US for oncology, cardiovascular care, diabetes and other conditions. All medicine will be affected by the AI technology.
Plus the wealth of data that emerges can support audit, research and help provide the analysis for continuous improvement. But it makes most difference when it helps a doctor treat a patient.
I really do not believe that computers and AI will ever take over from doctors. But I do believe that clinical medicine can be dramatically improved - in quality, safety and efficiency terms - and AI is the tool we need to achieve this.

Swiss based Tech Tour announced the top 20 Digital Health companies and the top 20 Medtech companies in Europe

The 40 companies have been selected by two Selection Committees made up of Investors as well as representatives from Life Science companies. The selected companies will be presenting at the Healthtech Summit in Lausanne to an audience of over 200 people, including Venture and Private Equity investors collectively representing $40Bn in invested assets, Business Angels and Life Sciences companies, among whom the No 1 Pharma company, the No 1 food company and No 1 Med Tech company.

Close to 200 nominations were received, 123 companies have applied and the Selection Committees have spent several months rigorously screening and choosing the final 40. Companies were chosen according to the uniqueness of their solutions, the strength of their business model, their capability to execute on the business plan and the quality and track record of their management teams.

Of the top 40 companies, 4 are seed stage; 21 are start-ups; 14 are in expansion/growth stage and 1 company is late stage/pre-IPO. In terms of the countries represented the breakdown is as follows: Denmark (1); Finland (1); France (3); Germany (7); Ireland (1); Israel (1); Italy (1); Netherlands (1); Portugal (1); Spain (4); Sweden (1); Switzerland (10); UK (5).

Source: techtour.com

 

Company Website
MT Adaptix www.adaptix.com
MT Admetys www.admetsys.com
MT Aeon Scientific www.aeon-scientific.com
D BetterDoc www.betterdoc.org
D Biovotion www.biovotion.com
MT Bone Index www.boneindex.fi
D BrainControl www.braincontrol.com
D Coimbra Genomics www.coimbra-genomics.com
MT coramaze www.coramaze.com
MT Corwave www.corwave.com
D dacadoo www.dacadoo.com
MT DBS System www.dbs-system.ch
D Dermosafe www.dermosafe.com
D Doctoralia www.doctoralia.com
MT Easyscan www.i-optics.com
D Emperra www.emperra.com
D Exovite www.exovite.com
D Genexyx www.genexyx.com
D Giraff Technologies www.giraff.org
D healthbank www.healthbank.com
MT Lambda Health System www.lhs-sa.ch
MT LimFlow www.limflow.com
MT Medical Adhesive Revolution www.medical-adhesive.de
MT Mensia Technologies www.mensiatech.com
MT Nano Live www.nanolive.ch
D NeuroNation www.neuronation.com
MT Newronika www.newronika.com
D Nutrino www.nutrino.co
MT oncgnostics www.oncgnostics.com
MT PathMaker Neurosystems www.pmneuro.com
MT Precision Ocular www.precisionocular.co.uk
D Psico Smart Apps www.psious.com
D Px Healthcare pxhealthcare.com
D Silvercloud silvercloudhealth.com
D Systems Healthcare Solutions
D TrialReach trialreach.com
D XtremeVRI http://alterniity.com/
MT Tissot Medical Research http://www.tissotmedical.com/
MT Wise



D … Digital Health companies
MT … Medtech companies



Freitag, 3. Juli 2015

UK startup Your.MD raises $5M for symptom checker app

London-based Your.MD, which has developed a health management app that includes a symptom checker, raised $5 million. This brings the company’s total funding to $7.3 million.
The app, available on iOS and Android devices, allows users to explain what their complaints are to the app via voice or text. Next, users enter additional symptoms and other personal information, like their ages and genders. Your.MD will then ask the user up to three follow-up questions to improve the accuracy of the results.
After collecting this data, the app provides the user with information on up to five conditions or illnesses that best match their symptoms and personal profile. Your.MD is also able to sync user data from Apple’s HealthKit platform and Samsung’s S Health platform. Users can set up multiple profiles for each of their family members.

While similar services exist, Your.MD’s biggest competitor is, arguably, Google. In fact, a recent survey of more than 1,500 teenagers in the US found that a majority of teenagers go online to look for health information, though considerably fewer use digital health tools or wearables. And Google is also actively improving its search functionality — in February, Google announced that by better leveraging its Knowledge Graph smart search algorithm, health searches on Google and via the Google app will start displaying a wide range of medical facts about the disease or condition in question.

Donnerstag, 11. Juni 2015

Spotlight on StartUps in Healthcare Social Media

Bildergebnis für spotlight onThe start-up companies, all under three years of age are
  • CanSurround "an exceptionally personalized, innovative web and mobile experience for individuals living with cancer" from the United States
  • Ignilife, "a unique web and mobile coaching platform to empower people to be active in managing their own health and wellness" from France
  • Junnah, "a cloud-based Arabic health and fitness software platform offering a comprehensive suite of features, smart phone apps, and individualized support services and programs" from Saudi Arabia
  • Medclinik, whose first product, "TAVIERX, is the world's first clinically validated VirtualNurseTM platform, with personalized and interactive patient coaching to optimize treatment adherence" from Canada
  • Nemo Health, who "integrates cutting-edge and sustainable mobile technologies in order to bring to the market disruptive, reliable, and cost efficient medical devices for physicians and patients"
  • The SelfCare people provides an integrated, secure & scalable Complex Health data analytic platform with a Web Dashboard, an interactive mobile app, Wireless Gateway at home which helps patients measure, track and gather data… to take ownership of their Health, from the UK
  • Wellsense Ireland is a unique health care pilot programme which takes place in a Primary Healthcare centre and is supervised by onsite family doctors, with the goal of treating common mental health issues, through onsite experience and online engagement, from Ireland.

Samstag, 18. April 2015

IBM gründet neuen Healthcare-Geschäftsbereich : IBM Watson Health









 Remark: Mehr und mehr wird der fundamentale Wandel im Gesundheitsbereich sichtbar. Das letzte Beispiel: IBM Watson Health!

Das IT-Unternehmen IBM in Ehningen hat den neuen Geschäftsbereich IBM Watson Health gegründet. Technologische Basis ist die neue Watson Health Cloud als Plattform für den Austausch zwischen Ärzten und Wissenschaftler in der medizinischen Forschung, Versicherern sowie Unternehmen aus dem Gesundheitssektor. Gleichzeitig schließt IBM neue Partnerschaften mit Apple, Johnson & Johnson sowie Medtronic und übernimmt die auf Gesundheit spezialisierten Analyse-Unternehmen Explorys und Phytel.
Ziel der Partnerschaft mit Apple, Johnson & Johnson sowie Medtronic ist die Entwicklung neuer Angebote und Dienste, die auf Basis von Daten zu Themen wie Gesundheit, Medizin und Fitness erstellt werden.

Partnerschaft mit Apple, Johnson & Johnson und Medtronic
IBM und Apple werden mit der IBM Watson Health Cloud ihre Partnerschaft weiter ausbauen, um Nutzern eine Plattform-Lösung für das Apple HealthKit und ResearchKit zu bieten. Mit den Kits können die Gesundheitsdaten von iOS Apps-Nutzern gemanagt werden. Forscher können damit auf eine Open-Data-Storage-Lösung zugreifen, die es ihnen erlaubt, mit den Analyse-Tools von IBM zu arbeiten.
Johnson & Johnson wird gemeinsam mit IBM Coaching-Systeme für die Pre- und Post-operative medizinische Patientenversorgung und Wirbelsäulenoperationen entwickeln. Dabei handelt es sich um mobile Lösungen mit Zugang zur Watson Health Cloud und deren kognitiven Fähigkeiten. Johnson & Johnson plant darüber hinaus, neue Gesundheits-Apps für chronisch Kranke zu entwickeln, für deren Behandlung weltweit etwa 80 Prozent der Gesundheitsausgaben in Höhe von rund sieben Billionen Dollar aufgewendet werden müssen.
Medtronic wird die Watson Health Cloud nutzen, um neue, personalisierte Therapieangebote für Diabetiker zu entwickeln. Dazu werden Daten aus den unterschiedlichen Geräten des Medizinherstellers, wie Insulinpumpen und Glukose-Überwachungsgeräte, übermittelt und analysiert. Auf dieser Basis erfolgt dann die Entwicklung personalisierter Diabetiker-Therapien.

IBM kauft US-Unternehmen
Darüber hinaus hat IBM die beiden Healthcare-Technologie-Spezialisten Explorys und Phytel übernommen. Beide Unternehmen sind spezialisiert auf den Einsatz von Big Data Analytics im Gesundheitssektor. Die von Explorys entwickelte Cloud Computing-Plattform wird gegenwärtig von 26 Healthcare-Systemen großer Unternehmen und Organisationen genutzt, um bestimme Muster bei Erkrankungen, Behandlungen und Resultaten zu erkennen. Über die Plattform werden über 315 Milliarden klinischer und operativer Daten sowie Finanzkennzahlen verwaltet. Dazu gehören Informationen von über 50 Millionen Patienten, 360 Kliniken und über 317.000 Versorgern.
Phytel entwickelt und verkauft Cloud-basierte Services, die den Kostenträgern und Dienstleistern dabei helfen, gemeinsam die Versorgung und Kostenerstattung sicherzustellen.

Der neue Geschäftsbereich Watson Health
Der neue Geschäftsbereich wird in Boston an den Start gehen, gleichzeitig wird die Präsenz der Watson Unit in New York City erweitert. Rund 2000 Berater, Mediziner, Krankenhausärzte, Entwickler und Forscher werden den Aufbau von Watson Health unterstützen.
Als Leiter des Geschäftsbereichs IBM Watson ist Michael Rhodin verantwortlich.